Skip to content

TOOLS AND BOUNDED ASSESSMENTS

Start with evidence you can inspect.

Choose a local collector or define an assessment boundary. See the required input, the output you receive, and the next useful step before you begin.

CURRENT ENTRY PATHS

Choose the evidence path that matches your decision.

Each product supports one of TacitSoft’s three recurring enterprise services. Start with a released local tool or an assisted scope conversation.

Public preview

Kubernetes Right-Sizing

Collect resource requests, limits, workload, and namespace signals in your cluster without sending them to TacitSoft.

Best for
Platform teams investigating Kubernetes capacity, request and limit drift, or an unclear right-sizing baseline.
Input
A local shell collector run against a cluster you control.
Output
A checksummed local bundle of raw and normalized resource-audit evidence for your team to inspect.
Free and paid boundary
The collector download and local run are free. Optional review starts with a conversation.
Practical limit: The collector does not upload the bundle, calculate savings, or apply changes.

Collectors available · Reports assisted

Diagnostics & Reports

Use released, inspectable collectors for bounded Kubernetes, Linux, compliance, and crash evidence, then choose whether to discuss review.

Best for
Infrastructure teams that need a safer evidence boundary before root-cause or compliance-oriented review.
Input
Only the inputs declared by each versioned collector manifest and its sensitivity rules.
Output
A locally retained bundle with a manifest and checksums. Report scope is agreed separately.
Free and paid boundary
Released collector downloads are free. Evidence transfer, report review, and commercial terms require a conversation.
Practical limit: The website does not currently accept bundle uploads. sosreport is not offered because public support has not been verified.

Assisted assessment

Repository Assessment

Define an evidence-bound review of repository structure, build and test gates, CI/CD controls, release practices, and observable security boundaries.

Best for
Engineering leaders who need a decision record before modernizing or accepting responsibility for a software repository.
Input
A named repository, agreed ref and scope, verified authorization, and read-only evidence access where hosting evidence is required.
Output
Evidence-cited findings, coverage limits, release gates, and prioritized remediation within the agreed scope.
Free and paid boundary
The scope conversation is free. Assessment terms are agreed before evidence review begins.
Practical limit: This is not an anonymous scan or security certification. Private hosting evidence requires verified authorization and read-only access.

CHOOSE A USEFUL NEXT STEP

Start with the decision you need to make.

Describe the platform problem and the evidence already available. We’ll identify the relevant product or help define a bounded assessment.

Start a conversation